[lojban] Re: lojban official reference licensing

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

My apologies; it appears I did not make a post that I thought I had.

The board is fine with you placing at notice at the beginning of the
book and at the beginning of every chapter stating that this is not
official LLG material and is not endorsed by the LLG in any way.

-Robin

On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 04:03:51PM -0800, xah lee wrote:
> 
> I'm sorry but i thought all the pass discussions about this is centered 
> around how to use color or style to mark edited part?
> 
>   Xah
>   xah@xahlee.org
>   http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html
> 
> 
> On Feb 19, 2005, at 6:52 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 04:12:46PM -0800, xah lee wrote:
> >
> > The current license is really juvenile and unworkable.
> >
> > No publication or scholar is going to have his work in every
> > sentence saying what has been modified from original.
> 
> We responded to this already, offering different terms.  I'm
> guessing that you didn't see the mail; would you like me to resend?
> 
> -Robin
> 
> -- 
> http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
> Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
> Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/