[lojban] Re: bumru

[Yanis Batura <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Dmitry <ratson@mail.ru>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:11:52 +0400
Subject: [lojban] Re: bumru

> 
> Yanis Batura wrote:
> > The second means not fog itself, but the liquid, of which fog is composed.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better that {bumru} had another definition:
> >
> > "x1 is fog covering consisting of x2 and covering x3"
> >
> >   
> Maybe, it would be better to say about fog itself  "bumru vacri" ?

Yeah, this tanru is quite a solution. But isn't it strange that we need a tanru to express a rather basic concept?

> PS Checked the message twice befope posting....

That didn't help you much, though - you typed the Cyrillic "r" in "before" :)


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.