[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: negative lujvo
- To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: negative lujvo
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:07:33 -0400
- Reply-to: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
>I was trying to come up with a word for "rude" and found there was no
>gismu. Presumably you could use "na'e clite", but if you try to follow
>the rule to make it into a lujvo, you get "nallit", which is malformed.
>Would you then say "nalclite"?
Yes.
>And what would you do in a case where
>both the gismu and the rafsi start with L?
y-hyphen. As an example (thoutgh there is a shorter form based on a short
rafsi), a valid lujvo is nalylujvo (presumably all words that are not lujvo).
lojbab