[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:41:39 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010614152905.00dca460@127.0.0.1>
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
> At 11:45 PM 06/13/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> > > In the first one you are displaying your feeling of happiness
> > > about ko'a going. In the second one you are not necessarily
> > > displaying any feeling at all.
> >
> >You displayed it through the use of "gleki".
>
> No. He CLAIMED it - he might have done so in a monotone, and he might have
> falsely claimed it. Assertions can be true or false. Emotional displays
> simply ARE.
With a fake smile or a contrived tantrum, emotional displays can be
faked. They are assertions of ones feelings, no?
-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!