Mail Index

• Thread Index

• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Richard Todd <richardt@flash.net>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• Re: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• gismu for attitudinals
  • From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
• to say "no comment" [from an earlier thread]
  • From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
• Re: Position question: go'i na'i
  • From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• RE: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• Re: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• Re: Lojban Wiki?
  • From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
• Re: [lojban] RE: zi'o and modals
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@RATTLESNAKE.COM>
• Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
  • From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
• Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
  • From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• RE: zi'o & modals
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• RE: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] RE: zi'o and modals
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] Re: Position question: go'i na'i
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• RE: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• Re: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
• HTML was Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• Re: HTML was Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• RE: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: Richard Todd <richardt@flash.net>
• Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: HTML was Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
• Re: HTML was Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
  • From: Richard Todd <richardt@flash.net>
• Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
  • From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
• Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
  • From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
• Re: HTML was Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
• Re: attitudinals
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
  • From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
• hope [was: Re: [lojban] Re: attitudinals
  • From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• Re: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• Re: hope [was: Re: [lojban] Re: attitudinals
  • From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
• Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• RE: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
• Lojban lessons available in other than html?
  • From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>
• Re: [lojban] Lojban lessons available in other than html?
  • From: Paul Reinerfelt <paulr@cs.lth.se>
• Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiki
  • From: Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>
• Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiki
  • From: Arnt Richard Johansen <arntrich@stud.ntnu.no>
• Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiki
  • From: Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>
• Re: HTML was Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• Re: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
  • From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• .ui, Propositional Adjuster (was: An approach to attitudinals
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
• Re: Attitudinals
  • From: graywyvern@hotmail.com
• Re: HTML was Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
• Re: [lojban] Re: Attitudinals
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• RE: [lojban] Cheshire cat
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
• Fwd: WARNING - Unable to deliver message - [lojban] Re: Attitudinals - Inappropriate Language Used
  • From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• Re: hope [was: Re: [lojban] Re: attitudinals
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals
  • From: pycyn@aol.com
• Fwd: WARNING - Unable to deliver message - [lojban] Re: Attitudinals - Inappropriate Language Used
  • From: "Chris Double" <DoubleC@acc.co.nz>
• Re: Lojban lessons available in other than html?
  • From: Nick NICHOLAS <nicholas@uci.edu>
• Re: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• Re: Fwd: WARNING - Unable to deliver message - [lojban] Re: Attitudinals - Inappropriate Language Used
  • From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>