Mail Index
[First Page][Prev Page][Next Page][Last Page]
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- New lojban IRC chan.
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiki
- From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Richard Todd <richardt@flash.net>
- Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- Re:Attitudinals
- Re: Fwd: WARNING - Unable to deliver message - [lojban] Re: Attitudinals - Inappropriate Language Used
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] .ui, Propositional Adjuster (was: An approach to attitudinals
- From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals
- From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- An Agreement? (was: An approach to attitudinals
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- hope
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- .e'i [was: Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] hope
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] hope
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- Re: [flamewar] HTML arcana (was: [lojban] Attitudinals)
- From: "James F. Carter" <jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU>
- Re: [flamewar] HTML arcana (was: [lojban] Attitudinals)
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: Anthony Roach <anthony@electriceyeball.com>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- Re: [lojban] hope
- From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- The "system" of attitudinals
- Re: [lojban] hope
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- [cht@gis.net: Why HTML-formatted email is wrong]
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Richard Todd <richardt@flash.net>
- Re: .e'i [was: Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- xalka
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] hope
- From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- Re: .e'i [was: Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- hope 2 [was: Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- RE: [lojban] Lessons
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
- Re: [lojban] xalka
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: "Daniel Gudlat" <gudlat@web.de>
- Re: [lojban] hope
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- Re: [lojban] hope
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals)
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudina...
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- Re: [flamewar] HTML arcana (was: [lojban] Attitudinals)
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
- dai harder (was: If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was: an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Value Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: .e'i [was: Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals
- From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] dai harder (was: If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was: an approach to attitudinals)
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Sentence translation
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: Value Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: [lojban] dai harder (was: If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was: an approach to attitudinals)
- From: Value Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions?
- From: Anthony Roach <anthony@electriceyeball.com>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] dai harder (was: If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was: an approach to attitudinals)
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Sentence translation
- From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: [lojban] Sentence translation
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Sentence translation
- From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
- Re: [lojban] Sentence translation
- From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: [lojban] Sentence translation
- From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Re: Sentence translation
- kona, but not the coffee
- Re: Sentence translation
- From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Sentence translation
- From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
- Re: [lojban] kona, but not the coffee
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
Mail converted by MHonArc