Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals

[Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>]

On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 03:04:43PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> known cases of inadequacy (a'o) not dealt with
Please clarify - why is a'o still considered inadequate? Because people want to
use it in two ways?

At the beginning of a sentence, a'o is defined by the Book to be a
propositional attitude indicator.
In its own sentence, a'o hopes for something unspecified and so can be used to
express a simple feeling of hope.

What's the problem?

-- 
Rob Speer