Mail Thread Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals), (continued)
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
Invent Yourself
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
Robin Lee Powell
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
Invent Yourself
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)
- dai harder (was: If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was: an approach to attitudinals),
Value Yourself
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
Invent Yourself
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
pycyn
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
pycyn
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
pycyn
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
pycyn
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
pycyn
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
Richard Todd
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
pycyn
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
michael helsem
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudinals),
pycyn
- New lojban IRC chan.,
Robin Lee Powell
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Invent Yourself
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,
Jorge Llambias
- hope,
michael helsem
- .e'i [was: Re: [lojban] gismu for attitudinals,
michael helsem
- Re: [lojban] hope,
Jorge Llambias
- The "system" of attitudinals,
pycyn
- Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals,
pycyn
- [cht@gis.net: Why HTML-formatted email is wrong],
Robin Lee Powell
- Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...,
pycyn
- xalka,
thinkit8
- hope 2 [was: Re: [lojban] The "system" of attitudinals,
michael helsem
- Re: [lojban] xalka,
michael helsem
- Re: [lojban] If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was an approach to attitudina...,
pycyn
- Re: [flamewar] HTML arcana (was: [lojban] Attitudinals),
pycyn
- Re: [lojban] dai harder (was: If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was: an approach to attitudinals),
Jorge Llambias
- Sentence translation,
Robin Lee Powell
Mail converted by MHonArc