Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

[Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>]

On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote:

> >All this proves is that go'i refers to the bridi, and not to the UI. I
> >agree. But my issue is not that UI are not bridi, but that UI are not?
> >assertions.
>
> Maybe we have a different understanding of what an assertion is.
> How can you have an assertion without a bridi? Is a smile an
> assertion to you?



Isn't it? If not, why not? How are you defining "assertion"?




-----
We do not like                                       And if a cat
those Rs and Ds,                                     needed a hat?
Who can't resist                                     Free enterprise
more subsidies.                                      is there for that!