[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
To
:
lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject
: Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
From
:
pycyn@aol.com
Date
: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:15:20 EDT
Prev by Date:
Re: [flamewar] HTML arcana (was: [lojban] Attitudinals)
Next by Date:
dai harder (was: If it ain't broke, don't fix it (was: an approach to attitudinals)
Previous by thread:
Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
Next by thread:
Re: [lojban] Are attitudinals assertions? (was: Attitudinals again (was: Sapi...
Index(es):
Date
Thread