[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: About the negators





On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Michael Turniansky


>> > Heck, is "su'oda naku broda gi'e brode" the same as "su'oda
>> > ge naku broda gi brode"  or "su'oda nage broda gi brode"?
>>
>> It is "su'o da naku ge broda gi broda". Nobody should have any doubt
>> about that one. {naku} is a shared term for broda and brode.
>
> Is it?   So how would you negate just the first part (there is someone who
> is not a broda, but is a brode) using naku and gi'e?

"su'o da broda naku gi'e brode"


  I'm a bit confused about this.  Under your rules (naku negates everything (and only things) to its right), doesn't that mean "X is broda and/or not brode"?
           

   I hope we get this all straigthened out before I tell you "su'o lo regerku poi pu batci do na bilma fi loi vidrnreibi".  It might make a difference....

              --gejyspa