Re: [lojban] Re: tagged termsets

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com> wrote:
> de'i li 17 pi'e 12 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Michael Turniansky .fy. cusku zoi
> skamyxatra.
>> Totus asked about the following at the end of [Esther] chapter 3
> ...
>> So, anyone willing to answer?  It came up again
> .skamyxatra
>
> This was already answered when you asked about this on the WikiDiscuss mailing
> list two months ago.  Since I'm not sure how to link to that list's archives,
> here are the responses that were given:
>
> Jorge:
>> "Tagged termsets" or "tagged-term sets"? The former are not grammatical.
>>
>> Anyway, "nu'u" makes no difference, it's an elidable terminator, and
>> there are two of them, one for each termset:
>>
>> nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri [nu'u] gi tecu'u
>> ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri [nu'u]
>
> You replied:
>> But why then does the CLL not mark the first nu'u as elidible in the
>> example cited by Andrew?  I assumed that the scoping was somehow
>> different between the two versions.
>
> Jorge replied:
>> I assume it's just a typo. In fact the first "nu'u" is more elidable
>> than the second, because "gi" itself always shows the end of the first
>> termset.
>
> Do you still have any questions?
>
> mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.
>
> --
> ko na xalni
>

   Weird, I THOUGHT it had been answered, but I cou;dn't find the
answer.. thanks  -gy