Re: [lojban] Re: shifting in tanru

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

.uacai.  So, this is what I was trying to get at with my question.  I didn't realize it only happened with {co} but thanks for asking the question that I was thinking Pierre :)

I can see the usefulness of it, but it does seem bizarre that in {ko'a ko'e brode co broda ko'i ko'o}, ko'a goes in the x1 of brode and the rest all go into broda (starting from x2) with no visual cue to tell me that "ok, we've stopped filling in for brode, now we're filling in places for broda". 

2010/1/13 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>
> So in "mi lo nu kargau le vorme lo nu darxi ri troci co klama le bartu", "le
> bartu" is x2 of "klama" even though there are three arguments before "troci"?

Yes, but I think you wanted: "mi lo nu kargau le vorme kei lo nu darxi
ri cu troci co klama le bartu", otherwise there aren't three arguments
before troci.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.