[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] la .alis.
John E Clifford scripsit:
> In the joy of contributing further to the going-on-60 year history
> of LoCCan typography, y'all seem to have missed the basic point:
> someone is offering to publish a work in Lojban on a real press for a
> real public, something that comes to very few conlangs. Jump at the
> opportunity, for goodness sakes!
Amen.
And I'm signing off Lojban List again, because I find I can no longer keep the
three vows of the Lojban dedicate: bikeshed-painting, yak-shaving, and endless
repetition. You can find me on IRC, sometimes, or write me privately.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy. Dennett and Bennett are well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett.
There is also one Dummett. By their works shall ye know them. However, just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly
known by his works. Indeed, Bummett does not exist. It is part of the function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.