[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?

To: Jorge Llambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:04:13 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <F273WE1QO05Ryn2HiVQ00006316@hotmail.com> from Jorge Llambias at "Aug 14, 2001 00:17:47 am"

Jorge Llambias scripsit:

> {lu'e la djan} means {zo djan} now

That's one of the things it means.  If la djan. is me,
then zo kau,n is also me lu'e la djan.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

References:
- Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
  - From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] {kai'i}
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Second session on Record: anaphora
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread