[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] [lojban-announcements] Essay on the future of Lojban, with a simple poll for the community.



Just to clarify, we're not talking about huge re-constructional changes here are we?  We're talking about things like xorlo and dotside.  If I have to re-learn the gismu that I know now and re-understand a new tense system, I would change my vote.  But as I suspect that what RLPowell is talking about is nothing so drastic as all that, I'm ok with change.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:02:25PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>   I would like Lojban to remain as close as it possibly can to its
>   current state, regardless of whether I or a group of experienced
>   Lojbanists see that improvements could be made.
>
> Agree or disagree?

I used to believe that the most important thing for the regular user and learner of Lojban was that the language should not change from under their feet, so that the effort spent learning it would not go to waste.

But the responses I've seen to this poll from beginners and old-timers alike have convinced me that, if this was the prevailing opinion fifteen years ago, it is certainly not the prevailing opinion now.

It does give me pause that the LLG now appears to be on the course to breaking the promise it made in CLL in 1997: “You can learn the language described here with assurance that (unlike previous versions of Lojban and Loglan, as well as most other artificial languages) it will not be subject to further fiddling by language-meisters.” But, since the community does not seem to care that much about stability, maybe that does not after all represent a fatal blow to the LLG's credibility?

In any case, from now on I will stop arguing for conservatism on behalf of a silent majority that turns out to nothing but a product of confirmation bias and wishful thinking.

(I may still protest if the BPFK tries to effect a change that I, personally, find too difficult to learn, but I don't expect such objections to carry much force.)

--
Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/
The names of a species, empire, language, homeworld, homestar and so
on will all be self-evidently related; Ogrons come from Ogros,
Arisians come from Arisia, Arcturans come from Arcturus, and Humans no
doubt come from Humus. --Justin B. Rye in A Primer In SF Xenolinguistics

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.