Re: [lojban] {le} in xorlo

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

(pc will probably want to argue that there is an objective rock

bottom, but let's stay away from that putative rock bottom for the
moment so that we have the two perspectives easily available.)

Geez, Louise, do I really say stuff like that?  Yes, I suppose I do (don't bother citing the references).  Of course, if we shift the frame we can get down to something else -- not necessarily deeper, but different.  In any case this doesn't have a lot to do with 'le', whose specificity (or whatever you want to call it) derives from its deictic character: the referent is already picked out and then it gets a label attached.



      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.