Re: [lojban] Named multiples

[Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>]

> I noticed something on that page that I didn't understand.  Why get rid of
> sa?  What could be more clear than "take next word and erase all previous
> words back to the last occurrence of the following word"?

(It's about selma'o, not about specific words.)

The definition may be clear, but it's apparently a headache to implement.
Have a look for yourself in the normal grammar.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.