Re: [lojban] nu pa moi se nunkei la'e lu lo do ckiku ma zvati li'u lu'u

[Alan Post <alanpost@sunflowerriver.org>]

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:20:26AM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> >    .i ko'a pe mi .i lo rokci pe mi .i ko'e pe do .i lo grana pe do
> 
> Grammatical, but no predicates here. I assume you want:
> 
> .i ko'a me mi moi .i lo rokci cu me mi moi .i ko'e me do moi .i lo
> rokci cu me do moi
> 

I am trying to learn how {mi moi} relates to {pe mi} and {po mi}.

I understand that pe/po are relative phrases, and I'm not sitting in
front of the reference grammar so I don't know why {pa moi broda} is
gramatical whereas {mi moi broda} is not.

If I say {.i lo broda ku me mi moi}, I understand that to mean
"broda is in set of my things (and events, states, &c?), but where does
this fall with regards to pe/po?  Can you possess something in my set,
as in the (non-grammatical) ".i do ponse lo mi moi rokci"?  To make this
grammatical do I say ".i do ponse lo mi rokci"?  Or am I saying "you
posses the me type-of rock?

Thank you!

-Alan
-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.