that {cu} is necessary right? If the {me} turns what follows into a selbri then the {mi moi} would get sucked up in to a tanru with {traji} right?
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Krzysztof Sobolewski
<jezuch@interia.pl> wrote:
Dnia poniedziałek, 27 września 2010 o 19:18:18 Alan Post napisał(a):
Ah indeed, ki'e.
> I personally think it could use a bit of fleshing out, it glosses
> over a lot very fast.
Yeah, no wonder I didn't remember it...
"It is perfectly possible to use non-numerical sumti after “me” and before a member of MOI, producing strange results indeed:"
Is it "perfectly possible" because there's no way to prevent it with grammar itself, i.e. it's a bug that became a feature? ;) Because I still don't have an idea what {me mi moi} would mean (me-th?).
--
Ecce Jezuch
"-Oh, yeah, that was really cool! Huh, huh / -No, that also sucked...
-What do you know, asswipe? / -We know everything, buttmunch"
- Beavis & St. Peter