On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Jonathan Jones <
eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/7 Jorge Llambías <
jjllambias@gmail.com>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jonathan Jones <
eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > 2010/10/7 Jorge Llambías <
jjllambias@gmail.com>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:32 PM, .alyn.post.
>> >> <
alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > .i mi ba tavla fo la lobjan. de'i lo ro djedi
>> >>
>> >> "lo ro djedi" is not a date, you want "ca" not "de'i".
>> >>
>> >> And "ca ro (lo) djedi", unless you are content to do it at some single
>> >> point in time valid for all days.
>> >
>> > "A side effect of the above is that in xorlo, if you mean "one bear",
>> > consider actually saying "pa cribe". It's ever so much more specific.
>> > xorxes
>> > points out that to refer to one bear, "lo pa cribe" is actually a bit
>> > better; "pa cribe cu broda" means that exactly one cribe in the whole
>> > world
>> > brodas, which is often not what you want. We (those of us that have
>> > actually
>> > been using xorlo for the last few months; there are at least half a
>> > dozen
>> > active users on #lojban now) have found that context is almost always
>> > sufficient, however."
>>
>> Is that supposed to be related to what I was saying? I'm not sure if
>> you are quoting that as support or as disagreement.
>>
>> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
> I was pointing out that you seemed to be disagreeing with yourself.