Re: [lojban] Re: mi kakne lo bajra

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

That's a tricky one. It's not concrete, and it's not an event (although some lujvo of it would be events, which is interesting from the perspective of a type system). Of the others, I am less sure.

mu'o mi'e latros.

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:55 AM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:

On 31 October 2010 21:55, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
> The "event is concrete" concept is interesting, but I disagree with the idea
> of lumping events in with physical objects in predicate structure. If
> anything they should be a third type unto themselves.

To which of the types does the x1 of {tcima} belong?

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.