[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: The place structure of {selma'o}
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:
> To add to this, yes there -is- a precedent that {se broda} is not the
> same as {selbroda} and it's even in common usage. {se kelci} vs.
> {selkei} vs. {nunkei} etc. etc.
My point is, {selbroda} can be a subclass of {se broda}, but cannot be
a superclass. I am feeling like {selkei} doesn't violate this rule,
and is therefore OK. On the other hand, {selma'o} if including BRIVLA
and CMENE does violate it, and is therefore NOT OK.
--
http://slobin.pp.ru/ `When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said,
<cyril@slobin.pp.ru> `it means just what I choose it to mean'
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.