You have misquoted me. My words were, as you quoted them correctly the first time:On 5 January 2011 23:05, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> As for the title/subject, I never said that lojban is *broken*, pardon me, IYou did, actually:
> only said that it isn't finished,
lojban is very far from being at the moment
it's a fully defined, complete and functioning language, which
"far from functioning" is very different from "incomplete".
"[Esperanto is] a fully defined, complete and functioning language, which
lojban is very far from being at the moment."
So what I *have* said about lojban, is that it's "far from being a fully defined, complete and functioning language", not just that it's "far from functioning".
I have to say that I'm disappointed and surprised at the same time at the irony of having my words so terribly misinterpreted and misunderstood by a lojban enthusiast.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.