On 6 January 2011 01:40, Luke Bergen
<lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
actually I read it the same way.
Esperanto is X, Y, and Z. lojban is far from being [that] at the moment.
=
lojban is far from X, Y, AND Z.
=
lojban is far from X AND lojban is far from Y AND lojban is far from Z.
If that's not what you meant to communicate maybe you should try saying it in lojban next time ;)
Wow, you guys need to learn your logic. Let's do it properly:
A = "lojban is fully defined."
B = "lojban is complete."
C = "lojban is a functioning language."
"lojban is not a fully defined, complete and functioning language" can be written as:
¬(A ∧ B ∧ C)
which is equivalent to:
¬A ∨ ¬B ∨ ¬C
which is:
"lojban is not fully defined, or lojban is not complete, or lojban is not a functioning language."