Re: Lojban is *NOT* broken! Stop saying that! (was Re: [lojban] Re: Vote for the Future Global Language)

[Ivo Doko <ivo.doko@gmail.com>]

On 5 January 2011 23:05, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:

> As for the title/subject, I never said that lojban is *broken*, pardon me, I
> only said that it isn't finished,

You did, actually:

 it's a fully defined, complete and functioning language, which

 lojban is very far from being at the moment

"far from functioning" is very different from "incomplete".

You have misquoted me. My words were, as you quoted them correctly the first time:

"[Esperanto is] a fully defined, complete and functioning language, which

  lojban is very far from being at the moment."

So what I *have* said about lojban, is that it's "far from being a fully defined, complete and functioning language", not just that it's "far from functioning".


I have to say that I'm disappointed and surprised at the same time at the irony of having my words so terribly misinterpreted and misunderstood by a lojban enthusiast.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.