[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] *-no-SA-handling in PEG grammar

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:43:51AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> Took me a while to figure this out because it's cascading.
> 
> >   pre-zei-bu-no-SA
> >   bu-clause-no-SA
> >   BU-clause-no-SA
> >   BU-pre-no-SA
> >   LEhU-clause-no-SA
> >   LEhU-pre-no-SA
> >   zei-clause-no-SA
> >   ZEI-clause-no-SA
> >   ZEI-pre-no-SA
> > 
> > I believe they can be removed too.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> I made a small script to check for others after those were gone; I
> didn't find any.
> 

Confirmed here, I'm not getting any more reports of defined but
unreferenced productions after removing these.

-Alan
-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.