|
Thanks a lot Luke, I definitely need to make some progress in lojban!
mu'o mi'e jexom.
Sunday, February 13, 2011, 6:36:45 PM, you wrote:
|
No problem.
xorxes: (in subject) the reason for not not-using "toi" (the lojban doesn't make that double negative look as odd as it does in english). (body) <xkcd link>
LukeABergen(me): EXTREME-AGREEMENT! Also, similarly "li'u".
<end translation>
Moral of the story, even if the grammar allows it (and it does in some circumstances) don't leave {toi}s and {li'u}s hanging. At best it's still ugly and confusing.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Jerome <jige@altern.org> wrote:
Folks,
I understand it may be a pain for you, but since I'm really beginning to learn lojban, that would be *very* helpful if you could translate this thread in English. Thanks in advance!
mu'o mi'e jexom.
Saturday, February 12, 2011, 5:13:27 PM, you wrote:
--
Best regards,
Jerome mailto:jige@altern.org |
--
Best regards,
Jerome mailto:jige@altern.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. |