Re: [lojban] girzu gi'i gunma gi'i se gunma

[tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>]

On 16 July 2011 16:38, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The descriptor involved is useful, though, rounding out the set of distributive--neutral--collective

lo--lo--loi ?


> So, as in English, I talk about
> bunches, or groups or crowds, etc.  On the one side, this is just a figure of
> speech to be ignored.  On the other, it can be taken as interposing another
> entity between the things and our reference to them.  That this entity is a
> Lesniewskian set and that the logic of such sets is exactly that of things
> directly (except for the intervening set-like notation) doesn't prevent some
> people from thinking that that these intervening entities are sets and thus
> Cantorian and so reintroducing all the problems (another reason never to use the
> word set outside mathematics),

How would you define a Lesniewskian set in Lojban?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.