Re: [lojban] Meaning of multiple negations

[Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>]

2011/7/22 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
>
> That in itself wouldn't be a problem. More troublesome is that "full
> bridi scope" is not well defined. What would you say are the relative
> scopes of "su'o", "gi'e" and "na" in:
>
>   su'o prenu cu ricfu gi'e na gleki
>
> (I say that means "su'o da poi prenu zo'u ge da ricfu gi da na gleki"
> but that puts "na" within the scope of both "su'o" and "gi'e", so no
> "full bridi scope" there.)

Maybe I'm missing something, because these conversations always make
me feel like I don't even know how to speak Lojban, but isn't the
"full bridi" that the {na} there has scope over just the embedded one
that comes after {gi'e} and before the first elided {vau}?

mu'o mi'e la stela selckiku

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.