From: Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, July 23, 2011 1:21:57 PM
Subject: [lojban] groupyness in definitions
I was thinking about how one would define "vrici" in lojban (I've since looked it up and xorxes has already done this). But at the time, I came up with something like {ro xyxipa cu frica ro lo drata xyxipa lo ka xyxire}.
Then I thought some more about it and started wondering if that {drata} was really doing what I wanted it to. If we're talking about {ro lo broda} then we're saying "all of those things that broda which are within the scope of our discourse". But now if I say "ro lo drata broda" that "other"ness is being applied to the "broda" and then we take "all of that".
Is there a way to say "all of the things in xyxipa taken as individuals are different from each of (all of the things in the set xyxipa minus itself as individuals) in property xyxire".
I'm clearly not well-versed in talking about groups and individuals and whatnot but I hope I've at least gotten the root of my question through.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.