[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
Well, I'm not quite sure what a generic abstractor or generic bridi
subordinator would do. It seems that each case where subordination of the sort
involved here is concerned, only a limited number of types (by the way how do
we fill in x2 of 'su'u'?) are possible and each gives a slightly different
meaning. What is left for the generic case? I suppose, following xorlo by
analogy, that it would, in each case, be the indeterminate middle of all the
possible inserts, assuming that makes any sense at all (what is the middle of
propositions, events, and properties?). It seems to add obfuscation just where
clarity us sought.
----- Original Message ----
From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, July 30, 2011 7:55:31 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
On 28 July 2011 12:34, Ross Ogilvie <oges007@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is a member of NU that already does what you suggest below, namely
> su'u
What I suggest is that there be a NU for the purely syntactic purpose
of subordinating a bridi and not to additionally 'abstract' some
semantic element out of that bridi. "su'u" is still such an
'abstractor' as far as the official definition goes; it's not a truly
generic bridi subordinator, since a specific type of its 'abstraction'
is always implied by the x2.
Either "su'u" or "nu" could be made truly generic. I would prefer
"nu", for similar reasons that one might wish to have "joi" and not
"ju'e" or "jo'u" as the generic connective.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
- References:
- [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: Ross Ogilvie <oges007@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Gerunds, infinitives and other technicalities
- From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>