Re: [lojban] da broda, ko'a broda, da bu'a, zo'e co'e

["John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Aren't any unbound 'da's, each is inherently bound by a particular quantifier.  That is a difference fro 'ko'a', which refers to specific referential.

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 16, 2011, at 9:21, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:

> Suppose there is a context where I have not specified "da" and "ko'a".
> Under what additional condition should I have "da poi ..." and not
> "ko'a poi ..." in order to create a re-usable variable for a specific
> referent? What is it that "da" can achieve but "ko'a" cannot, besides
> that unbound "da" is meaningless?
> 
> mu'o
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.