[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] fu'ivla



On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

I would use a cmene in that scenario. Also, I should probably mention that I endorse .xorxes.'(?) proposal to treat cmene as normal brivla (i.e. allow them to be used as selbri.) I personally believe that that simple addition to their functionality would be more than enough to cause fu'ivla to be completely deprecated.

Just to clarify, I believe the proposal was to allow cmene to have predications, the default being {ko'a me la.cmenes.}, although they can be given specific predications, like fu'ivla.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.