Re: [lojban] fagricipni's Translations #1

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:50 PM, H. Felton <lojban707@fagricipni.com> wrote:

I've re-read http://dag.github.com/cll/5/7/

On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 11:13 -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> You don't need the be'o.

This bit is accurate; though.

> It's only required when linking multiple sumti, or in other words,
it's only needed when using bei.

But, according to the discussion after
this example(http://dag.github.com/cll/5/7/#e10 ), your rule is
not entirely accurate; there are other cases where the "be'o"
cannot be elided.  Since this is the case, I will include
"be'o" in at least some places where it could be elided until I
fully understand the rules for its elision.

Ah, I hadn't thought of the {lo broda be lo brode brodi} case, in which be'o is needed to distinguish between {lo brode brodi} and {lo brode ku brodi}.

I wasn't aware of the NOI case at all.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.