[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:59:24 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=oysX1mEVeseiJjV4BLaqnBLfgcbJ5rkxbqCZFWmQogY=; b=w2IpYH20F6a7ZB8nT2OXbW4dFs/2EtYMVQ46nWOW1qR1RmaLGacHI3JHZjLdTdzssa Cs9rTbFUCjAHESYOzZjKxLuMPH/IIMuob41ho6KmMOZ1kCOUT7FW6VwV4+L2Mx3BnYES XbP4dETjCfQTU7eNEAhixSbkm+7iHPDjU6kI4=
In-reply-to: <4E9F2154.9010009@gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <1318202744.44997.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <201110190014.14668.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4E9F2154.9010009@gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)

On Wednesday 19 October 2011 15:13:24 And Rosta wrote:
> Ah, so "pi mu plise" is "half an apple" rather than "one in every two
> apples", then. That must have been settled after my intensive involvement
> ended. What ended up being the way of doing "one in every two apples"?

"pi mu loi plise", though that could also mean "half of each apple, considered 
together as a mass".

Pierre
-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

References:
- Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
- Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
- Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
  - From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread