[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: lojban and PR



Matt:

 The word 'Lojban' has a meaning in the language itself... As I've given my opinion that even the word list should be redone, I make it clear that I did not mean that Lojban should be changed forever with the current version buried... I meant that it should be used as a 'template' for a third version of the logical language... It took about 30 years to make Loglan, another 15 to get the final face of Lojban we see today built upon Loglan... And I imagine it would take 5 years to make LoCCan-3 or whatever it could be...
---
Clifford:
Hard line to draw between making up a new language and getting clear about the 
one we have.  The history of the latter enterprise, for example, has often 
looked like the former, and, to a lesser extent, conversely.  I suppose 
intention is, if not all, the major criterion.
 
 I needed 2 reads to get this! And I could understand Bilbo easily, no offence.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/5ThYTTY7w4EJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.