[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] random things



On Tuesday 25 October 2011 07:44:23 Michael Turniansky wrote:
> > Assuming {mi drani}, does it then make sense to use relativised pro-sumti
> > inside modally connected bridi, like so:
> > {mi djuno do .i fi'o se banli bo do pendo ce'u} for
> > "My knowing you has greatness in property being-befriended-by-you"
> > which is a really obscure example, I know, but bear with me here. Does
> > that construction make sense?
>
>   No.  As it says in Chapter 9, the end of section 8:
> > Note: Due to restrictions on the Lojban parsing algorithm, it is not
> > possible to form modal connectives using the ``fi'o''-plus-selbri form of
> > modal. Only the predefined modals of selma'o BAI can be compounded as
> > shown in Sections
> > 7<http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter9.html#s7>a
> >nd 8
> > <http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter9.html#s8>.

Camxes accepts it, so it's a limitation of LALR.

Pierre

-- 
gau do li'i co'e kei do

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.