Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> That does raise (again) the possibly important question of where it is
> that a bunch of lions cinfos.
>
> Obvious answers:
> (i) everywhere at least one of them zvatis;
> (ii) at some specificish locale, such as their centre of mass;
> (iii) everywhere.
>
> (ii) is icky.

It could also be the minimum volume that contains them all, unless you
require the answer to "where" to be in point form.

> Under (iii), {lo vi cinfo} wouldn't work.
>
> So I guess you're working with (i)?

Where would you say you remna? Is there a single right answer?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.