Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> Let's call this "naive kind theory".
...
> That's what I meant by "everything which can broda" - everything which
> you might refer to in any context by {lo broda}. So this domain is what
> you get if you just glom together willy-nilly all the various domains
> you find yourself working in.

So you've shown that you cannot glom together willy-nilly all the
various domains and end up with a reasonable domain. That sounds very
reasonable.

But this problem of domain glomming is not specific to kinds.

A: ie pei no da nenri lo vi tanxe
B: ie go'i
A: ie nai pei su'o vacri cu nenri lo vi tanxe
B: .y .y ie go'i
A: ua .i do jinvi ge lo du'u no da nenri lo vi tanxe gi lo du'u su'o
da nenri lo vi tanxe .i do jinvi lo nafsi'u

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.