Re: [lojban] restrictiveness: subordinate bridi (clause) vs main bridi

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

You've written it as for {noi}, that is, two independent sentences being jammed 
together.  For {poi} you need to make the {blabi} sentence a part of the 
description of the dog(s) -- or, rather the {cadzu} one, as you have it here.  
It is hard to give a restrictive relative clause in separate senence form.



----- Original Message ----
From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, December 3, 2011 4:21:49 AM
Subject: [lojban] restrictiveness: subordinate bridi (clause) vs main bridi

¿Which NOI would you use to combine this couple of bridi

  lo gerku cu blabi .i ri cadzu

, such that

  a) lo gerku noi blabi cu cadzu

or

  b) lo gerku poi blabi cu cadzu

In other words: What would be the default implicit restrictiveness of
the main bridi, if any?


mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.