* Sunday, 2011-12-04 at 22:06 -0500 - Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>: > On Sunday 04 December 2011 21:48:23 Jorge Llambías wrote: > > Consider "ge broda ro da gi brode su'o da vau da" instead. It makes no > > sense to me that the final "da" is bound simultaneously by two > > separate quantifiers. Nor does it make much sense, to my mind, that it should create two new quantifiers... > I agree. That sentence should be taken outside and shot. It belongs with "mi > te u do cu du ra'o lo gerku pe na ku". Yes, I think that's the real point. It's an edge-case, so it isn't surprising that no solution is obviously right. Martin
Attachment:
pgpng5Sagfa5W.pgp
Description: PGP signature