Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> * Sunday, 2011-12-04 at 22:06 -0500 - Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>:
>
>> On Sunday 04 December 2011 21:48:23 Jorge Llambías wrote:
>> > Consider "ge broda ro da gi brode su'o da vau da" instead. It makes no
>> > sense to me that the final "da" is bound simultaneously by two
>> > separate quantifiers.
>
> Nor does it make much sense, to my mind, that it should create two new
> quantifiers...

That's no different drom "broda gi'e brode vau su'o da" or "ko'a .e
ko'e broda su'o da". I don't see a problem in two bridi sharing the
meaning of the term "su'o da". Where I do have a problem is with two
bridi sharing the word "da" with a different meaning for each bridi.

>> I agree. That sentence should be taken outside and shot. It belongs with "mi
>> te u do cu du ra'o lo gerku pe na ku".
>
> Yes, I think that's the real point. It's an edge-case, so it isn't
> surprising that no solution is obviously right.

It may be that none is obviously right, but at least to me some seem
obviously wrong.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.