[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?

To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:03:53 -0300
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=zsTGR4zi1Fla67UfGzdsVNvCZyaBF8oAWl3kGNLy7Aw=; b=L9qD0fWYnhOyjQUUPyTDBM5IDZIWPdSaaNdVNKifaTfBr/quSOQc1R4BqdsPD8AdGW pL0bWDmIV8xTcXvBPMwvEjawbBRo83W5ZOLUzah3qdnwIQRUA6F9JI8nvC9o002jHZ39 obOXAK7bmr8AiFEydRiT+guTItyxV8HCd2/Og=
In-reply-to: <CAMKwHj2C14ntaO_bhRH_pE2z+EfSPCo9jXUknL8OMkAYu06+gg@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <2abfa90c-6902-4f2c-9ebb-3afa9f7c87b8@googlegroups.com> <CAMKwHj1KYyHCW-BvBu_XKY3Hv0mr1+e9UYQYC75KTiCPXy8mzA@mail.gmail.com> <adb2f7ca-6010-4873-9123-5f9545543baa@googlegroups.com> <CAMKwHj2C14ntaO_bhRH_pE2z+EfSPCo9jXUknL8OMkAYu06+gg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The list of words on
> the linked page is also far from exhaustive and each word is itself
> extremely general.

I believe the list is exhaustive. Every argument place is assigned to
one of the eleven cases, which is why they have to be so general.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?
  - From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>

References:
- [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?
  - From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?
  - From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?
  - From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?
  - From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] la snime blabi
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Lojban wall of complexity (beginner thoughts)
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Loglandic N-paradigm. Is it worthy of examination?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread