[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] la snime blabi
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Michael Turniansky
<mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:16 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Am 24.07.2012 17:44, schrieb Michael Turniansky:
>>
>> ".i ny za'u re'u pensi lo nu ta'i ma kau catra kei mu'i lo nu co'u lo nu
>> ca'a mlerai be ro lo selgu'e cu na surla kakne ri'a lo nu jilra"
>
> I just think it interesting that
> jboski had no problem parsing it (and let's be honest, most humans wouldn't
> have trouble parsing it, either, tending to think of "z'aure'u" as a single
> conceptual unit, and since, even if one does take "ny.ra'u" as single unit,
> the sentence doesn't parse, even a backtracking type of method must realize
> that that can't be right)
".i ny za'u re'u pensi" is grammatical, even though it doesn't parse
as intended, just like ".i ca pensi", because "ny za'u re'u" is a
tense. If a parser doesn't like it, there is a problem with the
parser.
I have proposed that PA and BY shouldn't combine, since the benefits
of such combinations are much less than the troubles they cause.
>> You can think about anything. You can think about objects, events,
>> whatever you want. Anything you can hold in your mind can be a pensi2.
>
> Again, the pedants (and I don't necessarily say that I'm one) would say
> that you CAN'T hold a ball in your mind.
The x2 of pensi is not for the thought that you hold in your mind but
for whatever that thought is about, It's like the x3 of tavla, or the
x3 of djuno. You can talk or think about pretty much anything.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.