Re: [lojban] experimental cmavo {ko'oi} of UI6 as imperativity

[Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>]

{ko'oi} seems fine then. With that in mind, I'll completely erase my old definition of xa'e and downvote it, such that it no longer be returned from searches.

On 16 November 2012 15:13, guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote:

.u'u the discussion developped during I was creating a Lojbanic
definition of {xa'e} as UI6. So do you agree with {ko'oi}?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.