[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?

Robin Lee Powell, On 19/11/2012 20:26:

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:19:45PM +0000, And Rosta wrote:

Robin Lee Powell, On 19/11/2012 18:52:

Oh, and that the PDF needs to be something we can send to a
printer to make a book out of, so (in particular) cross
references need to be page number based (which is why we can't
just print the HTML, or anything converted from it; I haven't
found anything that produces page number xrefs from html, much as
I'd *LOVE* to solve the whole thing that way).


If the book's subsections are sufficiently short, wouldn't
cross-references to subsections, rather than to page numbers,
suffice? Many academic books do work thus.


Well, you've got a copy of the red book, what do you think? :)

Can you show me such a book?  I've never seen that.  Maybe something
on Amazon where the "look in this book" is working?


I haven't time to do that. I'd just suggest that since this page number issue is an impediment to progress, you set it aside. The extra progress you could make by setting it aside outweighs any benefit of specific page refs.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.