On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Jacob Errington
<nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
..I propose something far more vague, like {ju'e}....
Your proposal is what it currently is. :)
Haha, although to be honest, practically no one (talking about IRC usage here) uses double FA, so I wouldn't quite call it "what it currently is". Also, I didn't think that any official decisions had been made with regards to double FA. If you can provide a link to a record of the decision, that'd be really great.
.i mi'e la tsani mu'o