On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 7:36 AM, la gleki
<gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 6:21:18 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 7:01 AM, la gleki
<gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 5:39:20 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
Just as my-two-cents comment, I would like to say that I too dislike the use of {sei ... se'u} for split quoting. As it stands right now, there isn't really any other option, although I think I like the idea of FAlu for that purpose, as gleki spoke of earlier.
I'll wait until tsani replies. I'm not a legislative power in Lojbanistan.
Who said anything about legislation? I was merely stating my opinion that I like the idea of using {FAlu} to split quotes over {sei...se'u}.
That said, excepting of course .camgusmis., NO individual has legislative power. The BPFK as a whole does, of course, but it's power is exercised via the votes of it's participating members- which, as far as I'm concerned, means anyone subscribed to the BPFK list.
IMO off topics must be held exclusively in Lojban but ok. I disagree. I'm subscribed to the bpfk-list (and I want to be subsribed to it further) but i don't want to be it's member.
The BPFK is dead and must be recreated of fluent lojbanic speakers of which i'm familiar with camgusmis, gejyspa, tsani, selpa'i, latro'a, xalbo, tengo.
Others must be forbidden to cast any votes. Sorry if I forgot someone and of course i dont force anyone to be a member of BPFK. I just mean that linguists or programmers even the most prominent can't say anything worth listening to unless they know and use a language.
And yet you do it all the time. :)