From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] searching
la latro'a cu cusku di'e
> It's not that it doesn't, only that it needn't. Specifying explicitly
> that it doesn't isn't possible.
Why not?
> va'i xorlo doesn't really "fix" this per
> se, in that under the modified "x1 looks for x2 at x3" definition, you
> can't explicitly say "I'm looking for a green thing, I don't care which
> one", at least not without introducing another bridi.
Why? What is the problem with "mi sisku lo crino"? This is exactly the kind of thing xorlo fixes.
mu'o mi'e la selpa'i
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to
lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.